Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Losing Isaiah, Losing Faith

Losing Isaiah is a movie about Isaiah, a black crack baby whose mother put him in the trash one night thinking she’d come back after scoring a hit but her getting stoned and passed out leaving the baby to found by strangers.  A white social worker named Margaret Lewin bonded with Isaiah in the hospital, she and her family later on adopted him.  In the meantime, Khaila was arrested and entered a rehab program.  Four years later, Khaila found out her baby was not dead, decided to fight for Isaiah’s custody and contested the adoption.  The court resolved to dismiss the adoption largely based on the issue of race.  Obviously, Isaiah did not adjust well to his “new” mother.  The movie did have a happy ending with the mothers putting asides their own feelings and placed the welfare and happiness of the child first.

My main grudge with this movie is how the court would feel that it was in the child’s best interest to literally tear him away from the only family he’d known and thrown him unceremoniously to his now-reformed mother. In this case, the court system behaved as if racial identity was the end-all solution and purposefully refused to figure the roles of responsibility and love into the equation.  I believe we need to examine the intentions of the parties involved before summarily positing a life-changing judgment.  According to my understanding of the movie, Khaila willfully abandoned her child in a dangerous place, the outdoor trash, to look for a cocaine fix.  The fact that she was stoned to the point of passing out did help the matter either, as it was, Isaiah was in mortal danger if the workers did not notice the boy and proceed to work normally.  Khaila did not volunteer to attend the rehab center but was placed there after she was caught shoplifting.  Therefore, one can argue that she did not intend to get clean, and the rehab center was a by-product of her arrest.  So the judge was taking the side of segregating the races and ignored the child’s safety and desire stay with his “white” family.  Just by saying Khaila was Isaiah’s mother and so her mother instincts should be enough to take care of him is wrong since Khaila had erroneously failed her son once before. 

The ending was pretty much a fairytale cop-out.  It looked like the director take a look at the plot and say “Well, we have to throw the Lewin character a bone to keep the audience happy and make us appear less racist.”

3 comments:

  1. I agree with you that the court's decision to take the boy out of his "white family" was wrong. It didn't take into consideration the reality that the boy had grown up with this family and that he had real connections with them. The court put more weight on legal precedence and politics than on human needs which is wrong.

    However, this is definitely indicative of a larger problem in our society that needs to be addressed. I think it is correct that birth mothers should have strong rights in regards to their children. I also think that the racial implications of this decision are immense and I am not sure where I stand on that issue.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What makes me ticked hear is the race card was pulled without any reservations about the child's mental welfare. And this is also why I believe that in regard to children, everyone should not be automatically granted 2nd chances. This is impressionable young children I'm talking about. Once is enough to ruin a child's chance at life, twice is unconscionable.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Isn't it true though that birth mothers give up their rights to their children when they give them up for adoption? Granted, in "Losing Isaiah" she was too drugged out to know, but unless it is an open adoption it seems like the birth family is out. For me it seems like it there shouldn't be a second chance for someone who couldn't raise the child in the first place. You can't put a childhood on pause. I agree with you, Cooki.

    ReplyDelete